Cambios hemodinámicos posligadura con bandas de varices esofágicas: un estudio de cohortes / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: existe controversia sobre la necesidad de mantener el tratamiento vasoconstrictor tras lograr una adecuada hemostasia mediante ligadura endoscópica, en la hemorragia aguda por varices esofágicas. Dado que es muy complejo hacer un gradiente "pre y posligadura urgente" en el sangrante por varices, nuestro objetivo es conocer las variaciones hemodinámicas tras la terapia endoscópica, midiendo un gradiente venoso hepático "pre" y otro 24 horas "posprocedimiento" en los cirróticos con ligadura programada como profilaxis de la hemorragia varicosa. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo, de cohorte, unicéntrico. Los pacientes, en protocolo de erradicación endoscópica, fueron sometidos a un gradiente de presión venosa hepática basal (GPVH PRE), sin modificar su tratamiento habitual con beta-bloqueantes. Después, se procedió a ligadura endoscópica, según guías de práctica clínica. Tras 24 horas del procedimiento, se realizó una segunda medida de presiones (GPVH POST). RESULTADOS: 30 pacientes. Las medianas de los GPVH PRE y POST ligadura fueron 16,5 mmHg (14-20) y 19,5 mmHg (17-21) respectivamente, con un aumento significativo tras el procedimiento (p < 0,001). Las variaciones porcentuales de presión portal, según cifra de gradiente basal (12, 16 y 20 mmHg), eran mayores en pacientes con menor GVPH frente a mayor GPVH basal en cualquiera de las categorías comparadas (p = 0,087, p = 0,016 y p < 0,001, respectivamente). En nuestra serie, el 36,7 % de los pacientes presentó un incremento de gradiente ≥ 20 % tras la ligadura. CONCLUSIÓN: la ligadura con bandas de varices esofágicas condiciona un aumento de presión portal, al menos transitorio, objetivado mediante gradiente de presión venosa hepática

No disponible

Hemodynamic changes after endoscopic variceal ligation: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: there is controversy about the need to maintain vasoconstrictor treatment after adequate haemostasis is achieved through endoscopic band ligation (EBL) in bleeding esophageal varices (BEV). Measuring a "before and after urgent-EBL" hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in acute variceal hemorrhage is very difficult. Thus, the goal of this study was to determine hemodynamic variations after an EBL session. A "before" HVPG (PRE) was performed and another one 24 hours "after-ligation" (POST), in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic band ligation as BEV prophylaxis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: this was a single-center, cohort, prospective study. Patients followed a program of repeated sessions of EBL until eradication of their varices and underwent a basal hepatic venous pressure gradient (PRE HVPG), without changing their usual treatment with beta-blockers. Subsequently, an endoscopic ligation session was performed, following the clinical practices guidelines. A second pressure measurement (POST HVPG) was taken 24 hours after the endoscopic treatment. RESULTS: 30 patients were included. PRE and POST HVPG median results were 16.5 mmHg (14-20) and 19.5 mmHg (17-21), respectively, with a significant increase after the procedure (p < 0.001). Percentage variations in portal pressure, based on the baseline gradient values (12, 16 and 20 mmHg), were higher for patients with a lower basal HVPG versus a higher HVPG for any of the categories compared (p = 0.087, p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively). In our series, 36.7 % of patients showed a ≥ 20 % gradient increase after ligation. CONCLUSION: endoscopic band ligation causes an increase in portal pressure, at least for a transitional period, determined by the hepatic venous pressure gradient.

Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by point-by-point radiofrequency application (PPRF) results in longer procedures than that achieved by single-shot ablation techniques. In addition, it is associated with significant risk of oesophageal injury. The POWER-FAST pilot study evaluated the feasibility and safety of PVI by high-power short-duration (HPSD) PPRF. METHODS: HPSD PPRF around the PVs was done in 48 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation. Fifty watts was delivered until a predefined lesion index value was reached (LSI ≥ 5 or Abl-I ≥ 350) and 60 W during 7-10 s in the first 18 and last 30 patients, respectively. A control group of 47 consecutive patients who had undergone PVI before the HPSD group with conventional PPRF (30 W for 30 s) was included for reference. Echocardiography and oesophageal endoscopy was performed shortly after ablation in all patients. RESULTS: PVI of all targeted veins was achieved in 98% and 100% of patients of the conventional and HPSD groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Total radiofrequency time was 34 ± 11, 24 ± 8, and 15 ± 5 min in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W (p < 0.001). Audible steam pops occurred in 4 out of 48 (8%) patients in the HPSD group, accounting for 4 (0.08%) out of 5 269 HPSD radiofrequency applications. No patient in the HPSD group developed pericardial effusion. The incidence of oesophageal lesions was 28%, 22%, and 0% in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W, respectively (p = 0.007) CONCLUSIONS: PVI can be achieved with HPSD PPRF in most patients. This approach appears safe and associated with low risk of esophageal damage.

Carcinoma de células en anillo de sello de la ampolla de Vater / Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater

Introducción El carcinoma de células en anillo de sello de la ampolla de Vater es una entidad infrecuente, con menos de 20 casos descritos en la literatura. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar dos pacientes con esta patología y realizar una revisión de los estudios previos. Observación clínica Los dos pacientes ingresaron por ictericia obstructiva. En la ecografía y la tomografía computarizada abdominales se apreció una dilatación de la vía biliar intra y extrahepática. En la duodenoscopia, se visualizó una masa excrecente de la ampolla de Vater que, histológicamente, presentaba células con características típicas de células en anillo de sello. Se realizaron una duodenopancreatectomía cefálica con linfadenectomía y una pancreatectomía total respectivamente. Discusión El carcinoma de células en anillo de sello de la ampolla de Vater ha sido descrito únicamente en casos aislados en la literatura. Por este motivo, sus características clínicopatológicas y su pronóstico aún no están bien definidos (AU)

Introduction: Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is a rare entity and less than20 cases have been described in the literature. We report the cases of two patients with thisdisease and provide a literature review of previous studies. Case report: We describe two patients with obstructive jaundice. Abdominal ultrasonographyand abdominal computed tomography showed dilatation of the intrahepatic and common bileduct. Duodenoscopy indicated a protruding mass on the ampulla of Vater. Histopathologicalexamination showed round cells and their nuclei were located on one side with prominentsignet-ring features. One patient underwent a cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomyand the other a total pancreatectomy. Discussion: Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater has only been described in isolatedcases in the literature. Therefore, the clinicopathological features and prognosis of this diseasehave not yet been well defined (AU)

[Cultural adaptation to Spanish and validation of the Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire]. / Adaptación cultural al español y validación de la escala GSFQ (Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire).

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process followed for the cultural and psychometric adaptation (validation) to Spanish of the Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire (GSFQ), used to measure the interference of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease GERD and to report the psychometric properties of this instrument. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The adaptation process was supervised by a five-member expert panel. After forward and backward translations in duplicate, a Spanish version was obtained, which was administered to two samples; a five-patient pilot sample to check comprehension and face validity, and a 4,000-patient sample to check structural validity (factor analysis and reliability), construct validity, and discriminative validity. RESULTS: The questionnaire showed a unique dimension that matched that of the original questionnaire. Reliability was high (alpha=0.83), and the correlation between even-odd items was good (r=0.69). The overall score correlated with generic health-related quality of life measures evaluated by the EQ-5D tariff (r=0.499) and VAS (r=-0.481). The scale discriminated between GERD severity levels (p<0.008) as measured by the Savary-Miller scale, except for the most severe level with respect to the levels immediately below. The questionnaire was able to detect differences between diverse concomitant diseases and antecedents. Sensitivity with respect to the GERD clinician criterion was 60.5% and specificity was 68.3%. Normative comparison scaling values are reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results show acceptable psychometric properties. A new instrument to assess the interference of GERD symptoms is thus available to health professionals. This instrument takes the patient's perspective into account.

Adaptación cultural al español y validación de la escala GSFQ (Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire) / Cultural adaptation to Spanish and validation of the Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire

Objetivo: describir el proceso seguido para la adaptación cultural y la validación al español del cuestionario GSFQ (Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire) de interferencia de los síntomas asociados con la enfermedad de reflujo gastroesofágico e informar de sus propiedades psicométricas. Material y métodos: el proceso de adaptación fue supervisado por un panel de 5 expertos. Tras la traducción, revisión y retrotraducción del instrumento se obtuvo un cuestionario en español que fue administrado a dos muestras de pacientes: una muestra piloto de 5 pacientes para valorar la comprensibilidad del instrumento y una muestra de 4.000 pacientes para comprobar su validez estructural (análisis factorial y fiabilidad) y la validez de constructo y discriminante. Resultados: el cuestionario presenta una única dimensión que se ajusta a la estructura original. La fiabilidad es buena (alfa=0,83) con buena correlación entre ítems pares e impares (r=0,69). La puntuación total correlaciona con las puntuaciones genéricas de CVRS medidas por el EQ-5D (r=0,499) y la escala VAS (r=−0,481). La escala discrimina entre los niveles de gravedad (Savary-Miller; p<0,008), aunque no para el nivel más elevado respecto a los inmediatamente anteriores. El cuestionario es capaz de detectar diferencias entre diversos grupos de enfermedades concomitantes y antecedentes. La sensibilidad respecto al criterio clínico de ERGE es del 60,5% y la especificidad del 68,3%. Se ofrecen los baremos normativos de corrección. Conclusiones: los resultados obtenidos son satisfactorios, demuestran buenas propiedades psicométricas y ponen a disposición de los profesionales un nuevo instrumento para valorar la interferencia de la sintomatología de ERGE teniendo en cuenta el punto de vista del paciente(AU)

Objective: To describe the process followed for the cultural and psychometric adaptation (validation) to Spanish of the Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire (GSFQ), used to measure the interference of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease GERD and to report the psychometric properties of this instrument. Material and methods: The adaptation process was supervised by a five-member expert panel. After forward and backward translations in duplicate, a Spanish version was obtained, which was administered to two samples; a five-patient pilot sample to check comprehension and face validity, and a 4,000-patient sample to check structural validity (factor analysis and reliability), construct validity, and discriminative validity. Results: The questionnaire showed a unique dimension that matched that of the original questionnaire. Reliability was high (alpha=0.83), and the correlation between even-odd items was good (r=0.69). The overall score correlated with generic health-related quality of life measures evaluated by the EQ-5D tariff (r=0.499) and VAS (r=−0.481). The scale discriminated between GERD severity levels (p<0.008) as measured by the Savary-Miller scale, except for the most severe level with respect to the levels immediately below. The questionnaire was able to detect differences between diverse concomitant diseases and antecedents. Sensitivity with respect to the GERD clinician criterion was 60.5% and specificity was 68.3%. Normative comparison scaling values are reported. Conclusions: The results show acceptable psychometric properties. A new instrument to assess the interference of GERD symptoms is thus available to health professionals. This instrument takes the patient's perspective into account(AU)